What reason does Hunter offer that supports his central claim that voting should be compulsory in the United States?

	Question 5a of 10 ( 3 Reasons 984571 )
	Maximum Attempts:	1
	Question Type:	Multiple Choice
	Maximum Score:	2
	Question:	What reason does Hunter offer that supports his central claim that voting should be compulsory in the United States?

	Choice	Feedback
A.	Many people feel that compulsory voting would be un-American.
B.	The government would not be able to survive without tax money.
C.	The chance to serve on a jury is the duty of every American citizen.
*D.	Citizens of the United States are already required to perform certain services.	Correct!

Global Incorrect Feedback

The correct answer is: Citizens of the United States are already required to perform certain services.

	Question 5b of 10 ( 3 Reasons 984572 )
	Maximum Attempts:	1
	Question Type:	Multiple Choice
	Maximum Score:	2
	Question:	What reason does Hunter offer that supports his central claim that voting should be compulsory in the United States?

	Choice	Feedback
A.	Wealthy and powerful people would have more of a say in how the United States is run.
B.	Candidates for office would be able to offer incentives to the people within the parties that support them.
*C.	More people, regardless of economic status, would be able to offer opinions on important issues.	Correct!
D.	Technological advancements would be able to help more people get out to the polls and vote.

Global Incorrect Feedback

The correct answer is: More people, regardless of economic status, would be able to offer opinions on important issues.

	Question 5c of 10 ( 3 Reasons 984573 )
	Maximum Attempts:	1
	Question Type:	Multiple Choice
	Maximum Score:	2
	Question:	What reason does Hunter offer that supports his central claim that voting should be compulsory in the United States?

	Choice	Feedback
A.	Leaders would be required to appeal to the wealthiest citizens of the United States.
B.	Leaders would have to offer incentives in order to get the public to vote for them.
C.	Leaders would need the support of the people within their political party to get elected.
*D.	Leaders would be judged by their ideas instead of their ability to stir up controversy.	Correct!

Global Incorrect Feedback

The correct answer is: Leaders would be judged by their ideas instead of their ability to stir up controversy.